Offering Information
Please select an offering above to get offering specific information
Course Description
This is a core course in the Juris Doctor program. It is approved by the Legal Practitioners Admissions Board (Qld) and the Chief Justice of Queensland as meeting the criminal law and procedure area of knowledge under the Supreme Court (Admission) Rules 2004 (Qld) and therefore deals with elements of… For more content click the Read More button below.
Topics
1. The definition of crime [Admission Rules 1(1)] 2. Elements of crime [Admission Rules 1(2)] 3. Aims of the criminal law [Admission Rules 1(3)] 4. Homicide and defences [Admission Rules 1(4)] 5. Non-fatal offences against the person and defences [Admission Rules 1(5)] 6. Offences against property [Admission Rules 1(6)] 7.… For more content click the Read More button below.
Availability
Toowoomba
Course Contacts
Kerstin Braun
Kirstie Smith
Enrolment Rules
Course Pre-requisites
Course Co-requisite
Assessments
Quiz 1
Online Problem Solving
Invigilated Examination
Learning Outcomes
Upon completion of this course, graduates will be able to:
1.
Demonstrate [explain and apply] an advanced and integrated understanding of a complex body of knowledge relevant to criminal law and procedure, and underlying principles and concepts; and the broader contexts within which legal issues arise in this area (PO1/TLO1).
2.
Identify and articulate complex legal issues [relevant to criminal law and procedure]; [comprehend legal and other materials]; apply legal reasoning to generate appropriate jurisprudential and practical responses to legal issues, and make reasoned and appropriate choices amongst alternatives (PO3/TLO3).
3.
Identify applicable legislation and delegated legislation, explain general principles of statutory interpretation, understand [explain and apply] and make appropriate use of authorised aids to statutory interpretation, and deploy appropriate techniques in the course of solving interpretative problems [(including problems raising special interpretative issues, [ fault elements and broad legislative terms such as a ‘reasonable’ requirement); and give a reasoned opinion as to the appropriate meaning of a legislative provision, and as to the correct application of the provision to a given set of facts] (PO7).